Concentration Risk: Holding Everything in One Place
The simplest control available to any holder is also the least used. What splitting across venues actually buys.
14 articles on this topic.
The simplest control available to any holder is also the least used. What splitting across venues actually buys.
Delegating staking to the venue holding your assets adds three exposures that the advertised yield does not mention.
Attention goes to exploits. Most customer losses have come from mundane failures of process and governance.
Two licences, two sets of obligations, and a difference that only becomes visible when something goes wrong.
Four kinds of report circulate and they differ enormously in what they examined. How to tell them apart.
Eight questions, answerable in writing, that separate a venue that has thought about custody from one that has not.
The composite pattern of how venue failures have unfolded, assembled from the public record of several.
The exposure is in the hot portion. What the published percentage means, and what makes it change without announcement.
The exposure is a chain of custody longer than the one disclosed. Your assets may sit two entities away from the venue you chose.
The exposure is assuming insurance covers your loss. Most policies cover a narrow set of events and a fraction of assets.
The exposure is that one person can move everything. Four arrangements, and what each one survives.
The exposure is treating an asset snapshot as a solvency statement. The two differ in three specific ways.
Two sentences in the terms of service determine whether your assets are yours in an insolvency. Here is how to find them.
The exposure is that your balance is an entry in a database and the assets behind it are held somewhere you have not been told about.